PeopleBeatingCancer supports an evidence-based integrative approach to cancer care. For most newly diagnosed patients, FDA-approved therapies form the foundation of treatment, while evidence-based complementary therapies may help reduce side effects and improve survivorship.
Click the orange button to the right to learn more.
Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects, and Treatment Process. How much does antineoplaston therapy cost? Learn about the ANP treatment process, reported side effects, monitoring, insurance issues, and questions cancer patients should ask.
If you are considering antineoplaston therapy (ANP) for cancer, three of the most practical questions are:
These questions are especially important because antineoplaston therapy is not a conventional FDA-approved cancer treatment. It has been studied for decades, primarily through research associated with Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and the Burzynski Clinic/Research Institute in Houston, Texas.
I have a personal interest in antineoplaston therapy because ANP became part of my own cancer story. But personal experience—mine or anyone else’s—is not the same thing as clinical evidence.
I will say that while I can’t speak to other patients’ experiences at the BRI, the information below was thoroughly covered by the BRI when I first began my therapy. Further, I didn’t care that ANP wasn’t FDA-approved, and I didn’t care that the information I read wasn’t traditional clinical trials.
The purpose of this article is therefore not to tell you whether you should or should not pursue antineoplaston therapy.
It is to help you understand what you may be getting into medically, practically, and financially before making that decision.
Important: Antineoplastons are experimental and are not FDA-approved for the prevention or treatment of cancer. No randomized controlled trials demonstrating their effectiveness have been published in peer-reviewed medical journals.
If you have questions about ANP therapy, scroll down the page and post your question. I will reply to you ASAP.
Good luck,
Antineoplastons are chemical compounds originally identified in human blood and urine by Stanislaw Burzynski, MD, PhD.
The compounds used therapeutically are now manufactured synthetically.
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), antineoplastons are mixtures involving amino-acid derivatives, peptides and amino acids. The principal preparations investigated in cancer patients have included A10 and AS2-1.
Dr. Burzynski proposed that antineoplastons function as part of a natural biochemical defense system that helps regulate abnormal cell growth and differentiation.
That theory remains controversial.
The NCI considers antineoplastons an experimental cancer therapy, and antineoplastons have not received FDA approval for treating cancer.
Treatment protocols have varied considerably depending upon the cancer, clinical protocol, and time period.
Published clinical studies provide some insight into what patients receiving traditional ANP therapy have experienced.
A patient considering treatment would generally require evaluation of:
Patients considering any experimental cancer therapy should obtain copies of their complete medical records before consultation.
These may include:
Historically, much of the published research involving antineoplastons has involved patients with advanced or difficult-to-treat cancers, particularly brain tumors.
Eligibility for experimental therapy may depend upon such factors as:
Patients should ask a particularly important question:
Am I receiving antineoplastons as part of an FDA-authorized clinical trial or another treatment program?
Do not assume that visiting a clinic automatically means you will receive antineoplastons.
Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 have historically been administered in relatively large doses.
Published clinical studies describe administration through methods including:
Depending upon the protocol, treatment can therefore require considerably more daily management than taking an oral cancer medication.
Patients considering ANP should ask exactly:
How will my treatment be administered, how many hours per day will treatment require, and how long is the expected course of therapy?
Experimental cancer therapy should not mean unmonitored cancer therapy.
Patients receiving ANP may require periodic:
Imaging such as MRI or CT scans may be used to determine whether the cancer is:
Patients should know before beginning treatment how frequently these tests will be required and who is responsible for ordering and interpreting them.
Antineoplastons are sometimes described as relatively nontoxic alternatives to chemotherapy.
That description can be misleading.
The National Cancer Institute reports that adverse effects associated with antineoplastons have ranged from mild symptoms to serious neurologic toxicity requiring discontinuation of treatment.
Reported adverse effects include:
| Reported Side Effect | Possible Patient Experience |
|---|---|
| Anemia | Fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath |
| High blood pressure | Often asymptomatic; may require treatment |
| Abnormal blood calcium | Weakness, confusion or cardiac effects |
| Irregular heartbeat | Palpitations or cardiovascular symptoms |
| Headache | Mild to severe headaches |
| Dizziness | Balance problems or lightheadedness |
| Nausea/vomiting | Difficulty eating or maintaining hydration |
| Loss of appetite | Weight loss or nutritional problems |
| Skin rash/itching | Irritation or discomfort |
| Numbness | Neurologic symptoms |
| Fatigue/sleepiness | Reduced daily functioning |
| Peripheral edema | Swelling caused by fluid accumulation |
| Joint pain/stiffness | Mobility problems |
| Confusion | Neurologic toxicity |
| Seizures | Potentially serious neurologic complication |
| Cerebral edema | Swelling around the brain |
One NCI-sponsored phase II study involving patients with recurrent glioma reported neurological toxicity including:
Researchers also found that higher blood concentrations of phenylacetate were associated with central nervous system toxicity.
This is important.
ANP should not be thought of simply as a “natural treatment” without meaningful toxicity.
Experimental treatments can have serious side effects just as conventional cancer treatments can.
This is one of the hardest questions to answer accurately.
Costs have changed considerably over the decades, and historical prices should not be interpreted as current prices.
For example, a 1999 review in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians reported that antineoplaston treatment at that time could cost approximately:
$15,000-$30,000 per year.
That figure is now decades old and should not be used to estimate the cost of treatment today.
A patient considering treatment today should obtain a written, itemized estimate directly from the treating organization before committing to therapy.
When evaluating ANP, I would not ask only:
“How much do antineoplastons cost?”
I would ask:
“What will the entire treatment process cost me?”
Potential expenses may include:
| Expense | Questions to Ask |
| Initial consultation | Is there an evaluation fee? |
| Laboratory testing | How frequently will blood tests be required? |
| Imaging | Who pays for MRI, CT or PET scans? |
| Medication | Is ANP included in quoted treatment costs? |
| Infusion equipment | Is a pump or other equipment required? |
| Other medications | Are additional drugs prescribed? |
| Physician monitoring | Are follow-up visits billed separately? |
| Travel | How often must I travel to Houston? |
| Lodging | Will I need to stay near the clinic? |
| Caregiver expenses | Will someone need to travel with me? |
| Emergency care | Who pays if serious toxicity develops? |
| Long-term monitoring | How frequently must I return? |
These additional costs can substantially change the financial impact of treatment.
Patients should never assume that health insurance will pay for experimental cancer treatment.
Coverage can depend upon:
Some conventional medical services associated with experimental treatment may be covered even when the experimental therapy itself is not.
The only way to know is to obtain written information from both the provider and your insurer.
Which charges are expected to be covered by insurance and which charges will I personally be responsible for?
Whenever possible, obtain the answer in writing.
If I were evaluating ANP today, I would want clear answers to the following questions:
I would also ask for the answers to the financial questions in writing before paying substantial fees.
This is where patients need to separate three different issues:
These are not the same thing.
The National Cancer Institute states that:
That does not prove that no individual patient has ever benefited.
It does mean that medicine currently cannot reliably determine which patients might benefit, how frequently they benefit, or whether observed outcomes are actually caused by antineoplaston therapy.
That distinction is central to understanding ANP.
| Question | PBC Rating | Why |
| Laboratory rationale | 🟡 Limited/Preliminary | Biological hypotheses and laboratory research exist |
| Human clinical evidence | 🟠 Low | Primarily nonrandomized studies and case-series evidence |
| Independent replication | 🔴 Very Low | Reported results have not been convincingly reproduced independently |
| Randomized controlled evidence | 🔴 None established | No published randomized controlled trials demonstrating efficacy |
| FDA approval for cancer | 🔴 No | Antineoplastons are not FDA-approved cancer treatments |
| Evidence of toxicity | 🟢 Established | Mild through serious adverse effects have been documented |
This rating does not mean that every patient story should be dismissed.
It means that the quality of evidence is not strong enough to conclude that antineoplastons are an effective cancer treatment.
For PeopleBeatingCancer, that distinction matters.
Patient experiences can generate questions and hypotheses.
Controlled clinical evidence is what tells us whether a treatment reliably improves outcomes.
For someone with advanced cancer, the decision is rarely academic.
The real decision may look something like this:
“My oncologist says my options are limited. I have found people online who say antineoplastons helped them. The treatment may be expensive. The evidence is uncertain. What do I do?”
There is no simple answer.
But I believe patients should evaluate four things simultaneously:
| Factor | Question |
| Potential benefit | What credible evidence suggests this could help my cancer? |
| Risk | What are the possible serious side effects? |
| Financial toxicity | What will the entire treatment realistically cost? |
| Opportunity cost | What other treatment could I be receiving instead? |
The fourth question may be the most overlooked.
Money is not the only limited resource.
Time is also a cancer patient’s resource.
If an experimental therapy requires weeks or months of treatment, the patient needs to understand what other treatments, clinical trials or supportive-care opportunities might be delayed or lost.
Patients considering ANP should discuss the decision with their medical oncologist.
Ask:
Would starting antineoplaston therapy require me to delay, stop or change a treatment that has demonstrated clinical benefit for my cancer?
This question changes the risk-benefit calculation substantially.
Using an experimental therapy after standard treatments have been exhausted is a very different decision from abandoning an effective standard treatment to pursue an unproven alternative.
I understand why cancer patients investigate therapies outside conventional oncology.
When standard treatments offer limited options—or when those treatments have already failed—the phrase “there isn’t enough evidence” can feel unsatisfying.
Patients want options.
I certainly did.
But investigating unconventional cancer therapies requires us to hold two ideas in our heads simultaneously:
We should remain open to therapies that may eventually prove useful.
And:
We should demand good evidence before assuming that they work.
Those principles are not contradictory.
They are the foundation of evidence-based integrative oncology.
Antineoplaston therapy remains an experimental cancer treatment.
Patients considering it should understand three realities.
Cost:
Current total treatment costs are difficult to establish from reliable independent public sources. Obtain a detailed written estimate covering treatment, testing, monitoring, travel and follow-up before making a financial commitment.
Side effects:
Antineoplastons are not risk-free. Reported toxicities range from relatively mild symptoms to serious neurologic complications including confusion, seizures and cerebral edema.
Treatment process:
ANP therapy may involve substantial medical monitoring, frequent treatment administration, laboratory testing, imaging, and potentially significant travel and caregiver requirements.
Most importantly, patients should understand that antineoplastons have not been proven effective through randomized controlled clinical trials and are not FDA-approved cancer treatments.
For someone facing advanced cancer, exploring every reasonable option is understandable.
The goal should be to make that decision with as much information—and as few illusions—as possible.
A good oncologist does not have to agree with every treatment you investigate.
But your oncologist should help you understand the medical consequences of your choices.
NCI Antineoplastons — Patient Version
NCI Antineoplastons — Health Professional Version
Buckner JC, et al. — Phase II study of antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 in patients with recurrent glioma. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1999.
An independent phase II study particularly important for understanding neurologic toxicity associated with ANP.
Cassileth BR — Evaluating complementary and alternative therapies for cancer patients. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1999.
Provides historical context regarding alternative cancer therapies and historical ANP treatment costs.
Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects Antineoplaston Therapy Cost, Side Effects