Multiple Myeloma an incurable disease, but I have spent the last 25 years in remission using a blend of conventional oncology and evidence-based nutrition, supplementation, and lifestyle therapies from peer-reviewed studies that your oncologist probably hasn't told you about.
Click the orange button to the right to learn more about what you can start doing today.
It’s no wonder that average newly diagnosed myeloma patients get confused by medical doctors when they talk about nutritional supplements. Is vitamin D important for myeloma patients?
In the Medscape article linked below Dr. Kenny Lin writes about vitamin D supplementation. Dr. Lin begins his post with “Who was buying and consuming all of this vitamin D, I wondered, given the limited proof of its health benefits?”
Conventional medicine doesn’t study non-conventional therapies like vitamin D so I have to give Dr. Lin a pass when it comes to multiple myeloma. After all, MM is a comparetively rare cancer comprising less than 2% of cancer diagnoses in the U.S. annually.
However, I think it’s important that MM patients and survivors understand the many possible benefits of vitamin D supplementation.
I am a long-term MM survivor. I supplement with vitamin D daily. I undergo blood testing regularly to check my serum levels of vitamin D. I think it is important for MM patients to undergo conventional therapies but it’s also important to include evidence-based non-conventional therapies like vitamin D as well.
Email me at David.PeopleBeatingCancer@gmail.com with your questions about MM and nutritional supplementation.
David Emerson
“The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) examined the former approach in 2021 and found insufficient evidence that assessing vitamin D status and treating vitamin D deficiency improved any outcomes. Last year, the Endocrine Society chose the latter strategy in recommending routine supplementation for children, adults older than 75 years, pregnant patients, and adults with prediabetes, but I felt that the only convincing case was supplementing to reduce mortality in older adults…
So, what will I say to my next patient without obvious symptoms of a vitamin D-mediated disease who asks if it’s a good idea to take a supplement? Three words: “Save your money.” In general, I trust guidelines written by and for primary care clinicians more than those authored by subspecialists. I also do my best to adhere to the maxim to “do no harm,” even if the harm is a small portion of an older person’s monthly budget that could otherwise be allocated to life’s essentials or an activity that is more likely to improve health…”
“Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure in older individuals with overweight, particularly in those with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 and those diagnosed with hypertension…”
Earlier this month, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated screening recommendations for osteoporosis. The task force reaffirmed their 2018 recommendations that all women aged 65 years or older and postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk for osteoporotic fracture should be screened. Notably, there were no recommendations around screening men.
“Due to a lack of available data, the USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient, and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men cannot be determined,” according to the recommendation statement published on January 14, 2025. Importantly, they emphasized that this should not be interpreted as a recommendation against screening men, but rather that there is a lack of evidence, and more research is needed.
“[It’s] unfortunate, frankly, that this same position is held year after year after year because it is a barrier to disease identification,” said Dolores Shoback, MD, an endocrinologist and professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.