PeopleBeatingCancer supports an evidence-based integrative approach to cancer care. For most newly diagnosed patients, FDA-approved therapies form the foundation of treatment, while evidence-based complementary therapies may help reduce side effects and improve survivorship.
Click the orange button to the right to learn more.
Melanoma vs. Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Diagnosis, Symptoms and Differences. Learn the differences between melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers, including warning signs, diagnosis, biopsy, dermoscopy, and when to evaluate suspicious spots.
Melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers are different diseases. Melanoma develops from melanocytes, the pigment-producing cells of the skin, and is less common but generally more likely to spread. Non-melanoma skin cancers—especially basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)—are much more common and are usually highly treatable when found early. A dermatologist may examine suspicious lesions with a dermoscope, but a skin biopsy and pathology examination are generally required to confirm a skin cancer diagnosis.
| Melanoma | Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) | Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cell of origin | Melanocytes | Basal cells | Squamous cells |
| Relative frequency | Less common | Very common | Very common |
| Typical appearance | New/changing or unusual mole/spot | Pearly, shiny bump or non-healing sore | Scaly/red patch, sore or growth |
| Risk of spreading | Higher | Usually very low | Low, but can spread |
| Diagnosis | Skin exam + biopsy | Skin exam + biopsy | Skin exam + biopsy |
| Importance of early detection | Very high | High | High |
Use the ABCDE rule:
A — Asymmetry
B — Border irregularity
C — Color variation
D — Diameter
E — Evolving
This is equally important because BCC and SCC don’t necessarily look like melanoma.
Examples include:
The American Cancer Society specifically notes that basal and squamous cell cancers can appear in many forms and may not resemble a mole at all.
Patient notices a:
The dermatologist examines the lesion and the patient’s skin.
A dermoscope allows magnified examination of structures that cannot easily be seen with the naked eye.
This is one place where your existing recommendation is strong. Current melanoma guidelines support dermoscopy by experienced clinicians because it improves diagnostic accuracy.
The American Academy of Dermatology states that biopsy is how skin cancer is definitively diagnosed, with the tissue then examined microscopically by a pathologist/dermatopathologist.
ESMO similarly recommends diagnosis based on tissue obtained through complete excision when feasible.
That should be the hierarchy presented to PBC readers.
Breslow thickness is especially important because tumor depth helps determine subsequent staging and treatment decisions. Current guidelines specify detailed histopathologic reporting after melanoma diagnosis.
No. Melanoma can appear as a new spot or growth and can occur in locations patients may not associate with sun exposure.
Yes. Although diameter is part of ABCDE screening, melanomas can be smaller than 6 mm.
Clinical examination and dermoscopy can identify suspicious lesions, but biopsy provides definitive diagnosis.
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and melanoma are both types of skin cancer caused by ultraviolet (UV) damage, but they behave very differently. BCC is the most common and slowest-growing form, rarely spreading to other parts of the body. Melanoma is less common but much more aggressive and dangerous, as it can spread quickly if not found early. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
Squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma are both types of skin cancer, but they start in different cells, look different, and carry different risks. Squamous cell carcinoma starts in flat upper skin cells, while melanoma starts in pigment-making cells. Melanoma is much more aggressive and dangerous. [1, 2, 3]
Not every mole that looks slightly unusual or atypical requires an immediate skin biopsy. A doctor or dermatologist evaluates factors like personal history, stability, and specific visual traits before deciding whether to perform a mole removed for biopsy or to use a watch-and-wait approach. [1, 2, 3]
| Diagnostic approach | Evidence | PBC rating |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatologist skin examination | Strong | ★★★★★ |
| Dermoscopy by experienced clinician | Strong | ★★★★★ |
| Biopsy + histopathology | Diagnostic standard | ★★★★★ |
| ABCDE/self-examination | Strong for identifying suspicious lesions | ★★★★☆ |
| Total-body photography in selected high-risk patients | Moderate–strong | ★★★★☆ |
| Non-invasive gene-expression testing | Emerging/adjunctive | ★★★☆☆ |
| Hereditary genetic testing for everyone | Not routinely indicated | ★★☆☆☆ |
PBC Evidence Rating: Ratings reflect the strength and consistency of available clinical evidence, not a guarantee that an approach is appropriate for every patient. Diagnostic decisions should be made with a qualified dermatologist or oncology team.
Once melanoma has been diagnosed, treatment depends heavily on stage. For advanced melanoma, immunotherapies such as Keytruda (pembrolizumab) may become part of treatment.
Patients interested in lowering future risk may also want to read PBC’s guide to preventing skin cancer.
I am a cancer survivor and cancer coach. I have watched early-stage breast and prostate cancer survivors benefit from similar gene tests. Patients need all the information they can get. Gene tests that indicate the type and stage of skin cancer is another important piece of the puzzle.
The third and final step is to add evidence-based, non-toxic nutrition, supplementation, and lifestyle therapies into your day in order to reduce your risks of melanoma.
Have you been diagnosed with skin cancer- melanoma or non-melanoma? Scroll down the page, post a question or comment and I will reply to you ASAP.
Thank you,
To Learn More:
“A new 2-gene pigmented lesion test that classifies skin lesions as melanoma or nonmelanoma could help with diagnostic challenges physicians frequently face with the visual image and pattern recognition approach…
Accurate clinical and histopathological analysis of pigmented skin lesions is difficult even for experts. Accurate, noninvasive diagnostic techniques could help in skin cancer diagnoses…
This 2-gene approach with LINC00518 and/or PRAME detection distinguished melanoma from nonmelanoma with 91% sensitivity and 69% specificity…”
“Genetic testing may be recommended when you have one of these risks
In the United States, a dermatologist may consider genetic counseling and possibly genetic testing for melanoma if you have had one (or more) of the following:
A genetic test for melanoma can tell you about more than your melanoma risk. People who carry a mutation on a gene known as CDKN2A have a higher risk of developing melanoma, cancer of the pancreas, or a tumor in the central nervous system.
A mutation on the gene called BAP1 means a higher risk of getting melanoma, melanoma of the eye, or cancers like mesothelioma and kidney cancer.
A genetic test cannot tell you whether will develop one of these cancers.
But knowing these risks can be helpful. It can help people get needed cancer screenings.
A positive test for melanoma can also help your dermatologist monitor you for signs of skin cancer. Patients with a high risk may need more frequent skin cancer screenings. Total body photography can show changes to your moles, which can help find a melanoma in its earliest stage.
A positive test also has some drawbacks. It causes some people to feel anxious and worried. Some people worry that an insurance company may discriminate against them.
If the test shows that you don’t have a gene mutation for melanoma, that’s great news. But it doesn’t mean that you cannot get melanoma. More people are diagnosed with melanoma than ever before. Most of them, 90%, don’t have a gene mutation that increases their risk.
Dermatologists caution that everyone needs to protect their skin from the sun. You still need to check your skin for signs of skin cancer. And you should keep all follow-up appointments with your dermatologist.