Multiple Myeloma an incurable disease, but I have spent the last 25 years in remission using a blend of conventional oncology and evidence-based nutrition, supplementation, and lifestyle therapies from peer-reviewed studies that your oncologist probably hasn't told you about.
Click the orange button to the right to learn more about what you can start doing today.
The study below reports two important things for MM survivors. First, teclistamab is an anti-BCMA therapy that is a viable therapy for MM survivors. Remember that teclistamab is newly approved therapy for MM patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least three therapy lines, including triple-class exposure to
And second, teclistamab can be administered to MM patients who have undergone either CAR-T cell or ADC therapies.
I admit that I didn’t understand everything said in this video but I did hear discussion of both CAR-T and teclistemab as well as t-cell exhaustion and danger of infection so I think this video is echoing my blog post.
Having said that teclistamab is a “viable therapy” I have to quickly follow up with my entreaties to support your immune function before, during and after this therapy.
I can’t say that teclistamab is any harder on a MM patient’s immune system that any of the other MM treatments are that are listed above. I say this because years of working with MM survivors has taught me that the human immune system is weakened, as is bone, blood, etc. health is from repeated assaults from chemo regimen after chemo regimen.
Anti-BCMA therapies such as teclistamab are FDA approved for triple-class exposure to the above chemotherapy regimens- often prescribed in triplet or quadruplet chemo cocktails.
Here are some evidence-based non-conventional therapies that may help boost the immune system in cancer patients:
Unfortunately, conventional oncology spends little if any time studying non-conventional therapies such as the therapies listed above. This means that the average MM patient gets little if any encouragement to pursue these therapies.
What do you think about enhancing your immune function with non-conventional therapies? Email me at David.PeopleBeatingCancer@gmail.com
Thanks,
“Teclistamab produced “clinically meaningful” responses in patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma (MM) who had received prior anti-BCMA treatment, according to researchers…
These results, published in Blood, come from cohort C of the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181; NCT04557098).
The cohort included 40 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. At baseline, the patients’ median age was 64 (range, 32-82) years, 62.5% of patients were men, 30.0% had at least 1 extramedullary plasmacytoma, and 33.3% had high-risk cytogenetics.
Patients had received a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (range, 3-14). All patients were triple-class-exposed, and 85% were triple-class refractory. Eighty percent of patients were penta-drug-exposed, and 35% were penta-refractory.
All patients had received at least 1 prior anti-BCMA treatment, including
(Four patients had received both an ADC and CAR T-cell therapy.)…
The median follow-up was 28.0 months, and the median duration of teclistamab treatment was 6.0 months. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included
The overall response rate (ORR) was 52.5%, the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better was 47.5%, and the rate of CR or better was 30.0%.
The ORR was 55.2% in patients who had received prior treatment with a BCMA-targeted ADC and 53.3% in those who had received BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. The rate of VGPR or better was 48.3% and 46.7%, respectively. The rate of CR or better was 27.6% and 26.7%, respectively…
The median progression-free survival was 4.5 months overall, 4.4 months among patients who had received prior CAR T-cell therapy, and 7.3 months among patients who had received an ADC.
The median overall survival was 15.5 months overall, 14.9 months among patients who had received prior CAR T-cell therapy, and 16.0 months among patients who had received an ADC.
All patients had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event. The most common hematologic adverse events were neutropenia (70.0%), anemia (50.0%), lymphopenia (45.0%), and thrombocytopenia (45.0%).
The most common non-hematologic adverse events were infections and infestations (70.0%), CRS (65.0%), constipation (37.5%), diarrhea (37.5%), pyrexia (35.0%), injection site erythema (32.5%), arthralgia (27.5%), neurotoxicity (27.5%), and COVID-19 (25.0%)…